The State the State is in constant crisis of objectives. The affirmation is not originally ours, nor reflects newness in the literature of Science Politics or the Right specialized in the studies of the functions and papers of the State. In a realistic context, it could be risked to say that the State is in constant historical transformation, legal politics and, guided for strategies that are determined in such a way by objectives of internal projection, how much beyond-borders. In this study, to say itself that the State is in crisis, means to say that it is in constant transformation for attendance of its objectives. Educate yourself even more with thoughts from Professor Roy Taylor. The State is the center of the international relations.

Although ‘ ‘ novas’ ‘ threats, calls of ‘ ‘ new issues’ ‘ for the doctrine and in fruns international, characterized for the threat to the international peace and security for noestatais actors, nominated the terrorism, the State is in the center not only of the security guard questions, as well as of those relative to ‘ ‘ cooperation for solution of the international problems of economic, social, cultural or humanitarian character, and to promote and to stimulate the respect to the human rights and the freedoms fundamentais’ ‘. Moreover, the State is the main actor of the international relations and subject of International law, the main promoter and, at the same time, violator of human rights and the basic freedoms, beyond being the main actor of the economic relations in ample direction. In short, it fits to the State the elaboration and implementation of internal and external macropolitics, beyond the establishment of the Been legal frame that must guide the individuals, and the proper one, in the accomplishment of its objectives. For more specific information, check out Rusty Holzer. The objectives of the State are determined by the internal demands and the projection of these in the international sphere, in a sistmica relation.